Homestuck Test/Quiz Results

[CrimsonMage]

I think either A: That test is biased towards asymmetrical Derse dreamers, or B: We, as Homestuck fans, are more likely to be asymmetrical Derse dreamers, because that's what most of us seem to be getting.

[Raziere]

Hey I got balanced derse dreamer, so whatevs. and I agree with it. I'd be fine amid that purple landscape. nice, dark, probably quiet…and once the game starts, I'd be in the right place to take down the enemy as well as sabotage all their plans.

the downside is that the Midnight Crew might come for me, but I never liked them anyways.

[Craw Avesse]

I try both of the test and got Prospit. Pretty interesting.

For the titles, I try many times and I mostly got Slyph. Here if the link works.
http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/rvall...iz/hsquiz.html
I found out it's really hard to get Seer class. I'm also kinda wish there will be Seer of Rage, but I can't found the right combination! It depressed me. =T_T=

When I try the title on Tumblr, I get Knight of Keys/Space/Void. I even don't know what is Keys capable of. =O_O=

For the Homestuck chara I love the most... I want to cry when get Dirk. He's so like me in many way. But I am not smart at all. Xc)))

[unstopableAnimosity]

I dare to STRONGLY object against this test from tumblr. If one reads what do enneagram types mean it is clear that both Karkat and Kankri are type 1 "The Reformer". Therefore, this test should either relate type 1w2 and 1w9 Knight and Seer OR relate enneagram with aspect (so type 1 would mean Blood)

I've got "Bard of Space" which is simply unfair and I refuse to be such tricky class. I'm a straight-forward simple brute goddammit!

[Raziere]

then its working as intended! homestuck classpects is designed to challenge you after all.

and none of the classes are really straightforward or simple brutes anyways. even the most active classes work in unexpected, metaphorical ways.

[unstopableAnimosity]

So basically session expects me to "allow" things to happen instead of causing them? Well, that is certainly a great challenge. I could see myself as a Knight or Seer(Mage?) since I'm a genius despite being simple, but let it be Bard.

The other test from andrew.cmu is rather goofy, with too obvious questions. They could as well ask "What class would you like to be". And they kinda did, since I got Mage of Light.

[megidona]

ive taken the classpect test oodles of times because im never all that satisfied with what i get so
i usually get made or mage of space uhg boring.

i got roxy for the character one aw ye~

[Wulf]

I dare to STRONGLY object against this test from tumblr. If one reads what do enneagram types mean it is clear that both Karkat and Kankri are type 1 "The Reformer". Therefore, this test should either relate type 1w2 and 1w9 Knight and Seer OR relate enneagram with aspect (so type 1 would mean Blood)

Eh. Kankri is decidedly a 1w-...Karkat, I don't see it. He's much more strongly a 6w-. As is Dave. Also keep in mind that Kankri is a failed Seer. If I recall correctly, he never even developed any powers until after the Scratch. Rose and Terezi are much better examples to look at, and (to me,) they fit 5w4 almost to a T.

[unstopableAnimosity]

Eh. Kankri is decidedly a 1w-...Karkat, I don't see it. He's much more strongly a 6w-. As is Dave. Also keep in mind that Kankri is a failed Seer. If I recall correctly, he never even developed any powers until after the Scratch. Rose and Terezi are much better examples to look at, and (to me,) they fit 5w4 almost to a T.

Think about it as an example of evolution: people like Kankri, who try to fix everything and save everyone eventually give up and become bitter, enraged. That's what happened to post-scratch version of Kankri aka The Sufferer, but also to Karkat. Karkat is much of a reformer who encountered infinite ocbstacles on his way of helping anyone so he became permemently angry. Being insecura and hating himself for his own flaws are just a side effect of him being a perfectionist, which also results in his intend to help others (because their lives aren't perfect).

[Wulf]

Think about it as an example of evolution: people like Kankri, who try to fix everything and save everyone eventually give up and become bitter, enraged. That's what happened to post-scratch version of Kankri aka The Sufferer, but also to Karkat. Karkat is much of a reformer who encountered infinite ocbstacles on his way of helping anyone so he became permemently angry. Being insecura and hating himself for his own flaws are just a side effect of him being a perfectionist, which also results in his intend to help others (because their lives aren't perfect).

Kankri is a perfect example of what a Seer shouldn't be, though. Not only did he never develop his powers, he never learned to communicate effectively, the source of his frustration. It's not a matter of trying to help everyone and failing, it's a matter of being a smug asshole who does nothing but get on people's nerves.

Karkat, meanwhile does have shades of trying to help people, but his problems come from his own insecurities, not from his desire to help people. He shouts and is ornery all the time to keep those insecurities from showing through, not because he wants to reform society or anything like that. Similarly, Dave has his expertly crafted coolkid persona and Latula has her gamer grrl...ness, which I believe both Meenah and Aranea mention is her overcompensating.

Focusing on people is something both Blood players do, but they have less in common with one another than they do with other members of the same class. Karkat's problems come from "Oh god, what will OTHER PEOPLE think?" while Kankri's comes from "I want OTHER PEOPLE to do as I say, whether I'm right or not," which is not very Seer-ly behavior when you look at Rose or Terezi.

[unstopableAnimosity]

Kankri is a perfect example of what a Seer shouldn't be, though. Not only did he never develop his powers, he never learned to communicate effectively, the source of his frustration. It's not a matter of trying to help everyone and failing, it's a matter of being a smug asshole who does nothing but get on people's nerves.

Karkat, meanwhile does have shades of trying to help people, but his problems come from his own insecurities, not from his desire to help people. He shouts and is ornery all the time to keep those insecurities from showing through, not because he wants to reform society or anything like that. Similarly, Dave has his expertly crafted coolkid persona and Latula has her gamer grrl...ness, which I believe both Meenah and Aranea mention is her overcompensating.

Focusing on people is something both Blood players do, but they have less in common with one another than they do with other members of the same class. Karkat's problems come from "Oh god, what will OTHER PEOPLE think?" while Kankri's comes from "I want OTHER PEOPLE to do as I say, whether I'm right or not," which is not very Seer-ly behavior when you look at Rose or Terezi.

Well, regardless his efficiency in guiding others, he did happen to be Seer, and beacuse this test is not called "Which title would allow you to be the best player possible" but "What title would one get" my statement stands. At least when it comes to Kankri.

I still believe that Karkat is actually an example of "upgraded" Kankri, my opinion is based on fact that I do know people like that for some time and I happened to see the origin of their rage AND on statement "hate oneself for it's flaws" which is like trademark for Karkat at least until CASCADE and meteor ride. I will read hivebent again and provide you with some more "hints" as I see them, it will take some time though.

No you didn't just say that about Kankri. He may force others to do as he says but it's not for his pleasure, it's because he believes that's the right thing to do. He cares a lot about communication and while he fails miserably at improving in it his motives are pure and despite his annoying attitude he is not a bad person. Hell, he is The Signless, isn't he? The difference between them is that world Signless lived in was cruel and dark, thus in need of someone to fix it, while flaws of Beforus were less... crucial, so a person trying to create an utopia is viewed as a jerk.

[Argie]

Not only did he never develop his powers, he never learned to communicate effectively, the source of his frustration.

That seems to be a common Seer problem in general, actually, and may be part of the arc they're supposed to go through - Rose mentions (to Meenah) that she feels she's not good at talking to other people, and does tend to be very cagey and indirect; while Terezi has one of the most difficult-to-read quirks and (at least while she was blind) can't draw for shit if she needs to communicate visually (she suffers from this the least, though, which may be why she was also the most effective seer of the three). Which fits with the "Oracle of Delphi" archetype that the sprites also follow, really.

[Fabrimuch]

I´m apparently a Page of Breath, like Tavros, and got the balanced Prospit Dreamer result (like Jade). I´m not sure how I feel about that. I´d feel okay with either Prospit or Derse, they´re both beautiful in their own way. I´m not sure what exactly being a Page or a Breath player entails, but I sure as fuck don´t like the speedos.

The one about which characer are you most like is kinda stupid. It says I´m like Sollux, but I identify more closely to Tavros and Karkat (Karkat because I get angry very easily, Tavros because I´m very insecure and passive, and let others boss me around).

[jwmcd2]

Well, I know this is an awkward first post, but I figure eh, why not post in here.

Did the tests. Prospit Asymmetrical, Prince of Time. I find that rather... intimidating. I wouldn't have expected something so God-Moddy.

[Wulf]

Well, regardless his efficiency in guiding others, he did happen to be Seer, and beacuse this test is not called "Which title would allow you to be the best player possible" but "What title would one get" my statement stands. At least when it comes to Kankri.

He got the title of Seer because he was "meant" to be more like Rose or Terezi. He failed miserably at it. It's not a matter of "what title would you be best at" it's a matter of "he was absolutely a terrible Seer and never overcame his own issues, therefore he's a bad example of a Seer"

I still believe that Karkat is actually an example of "upgraded" Kankri, my opinion is based on fact that I do know people like that for some time and I happened to see the origin of their rage AND on statement "hate oneself for it's flaws" which is like trademark for Karkat at least until CASCADE and meteor ride. I will read hivebent again and provide you with some more "hints" as I see them, it will take some time though.

Karkat hating himself for his flaws is something I agree with-- that's a trait all Knights share. If you mean that that's not the case, I'll wait and see what evidence you bring up. Karkat is an outcast, or at least, feels like he is and wants to change that. He projects that angry persona to cover for it, but admits to Meenah that he had a childish fantasy of being in a position of status (a Threshecutioner) and not being killed on the spot for his blood.

No you didn't just say that about Kankri. He may force others to do as he says but it's not for his pleasure, it's because he believes that's the right thing to do. He cares a lot about communication and while he fails miserably at improving in it his motives are pure and despite his annoying attitude he is not a bad person. Hell, he is The Signless, isn't he? The difference between them is that world Signless lived in was cruel and dark, thus in need of someone to fix it, while flaws of Beforus were less... crucial, so a person trying to create an utopia is viewed as a jerk.

There are similarities with Kankri and the Sufferer across the Scratch, but they're not really the same person due to the different environments they lived in. Kankri believes it's the right thing to do, but that doesn't somehow mean he's not a smug asshole when he corrects people in conversations that don't involve or impact him in the slightest, or refuses to let them get a word in edgewise. Hell, he outright had a Freudian slip and referred to one of his conversations (I believe with Karkat) as a "monologue" before hastily correcting himself.

The Signless/Sufferer is almost the exact opposite of Kankri in method, and comes off looking like a much better Seer because of it. Here's what Doc Scratch has to say about his methods:

"[...] He would preach heretical ideas no one else had dared to entertain, let alone risk discussing. He espoused the virtues of forgiveness, compassion, and equality among all bloodlines. He distributed his message intelligently, careful to preach only to those receptive, never attracting unwelcome attention."

Contrast Kankri who tries to change his society in a similar manner, but rather than try to teach people the right things to do, tries to shame them out of doing the wrong things, rather than trying to educate people who want to be educated, goes out of his way to bother people who don't care, and as a whole is far too active in his methods to be a good Seer.

[Sorariko]

Took both long and short test, and both moon tests, my results:
1) I'm either Knight (long test) or Page (redone first part of long test on my native language, plus short test) - level 5 and 6, respectively;
2) I'm either Hero of Light (low possibility, since it's don't suit me at all), Breath (high possibility) or Zen (don't count it), since their words got lowest percentage of all of words - 18%;
3) I'm Asymmetrical Derse Dreamer, Chart-the-Course.
Well, I'm mix of Latula and Karkat, with some bits of Tavros and Jake, though some test told me that I'm acting like Terezi and Nepeta.

[unstopableAnimosity]

Well, I know this is an awkward first post, but I figure eh, why not post in here.

Did the tests. Prospit Asymmetrical, Prince of Time. I find that rather... intimidating. I wouldn't have expected something so God-Moddy.

It's God-Moddy only when you think about it as "Destroyer who poessess powers of Time" which is pretty overdone. However, imagine posiibilities of usage before ascension. Prince is a class that destroys aspect or destroys through their aspect so you could either:
1)Destroy Time of your enemies, meaning Deristes would loose because they didn't have enough time to stop you and your co-players before forginf The Frog and winning the session.
2)Destroy your enemies through Time, eg. scratch black queens ring after first prototyping, so it would start to slowly crush into pieces, which would happen somewhere around the end of your session.
3)Destroy Beat Mesa through Time, so damage it at the early stage of session which would slowly advance and eventually cause unpredictable Scratch when you and your teammates are losing.

Ok, now to the previous topic:

He got the title of Seer because he was "meant" to be more like Rose or Terezi. He failed miserably at it. It's not a matter of "what title would you be best at" it's a matter of "he was absolutely a terrible Seer and never overcame his own issues, therefore he's a bad example of a Seer"

I'll be lazy and just second the statement below:

That seems to be a common Seer problem in general, actually, and may be part of the arc they're supposed to go through - Rose mentions (to Meenah) that she feels she's not good at talking to other people, and does tend to be very cagey and indirect; while Terezi has one of the most difficult-to-read quirks and (at least while she was blind) can't draw for shit if she needs to communicate visually (she suffers from this the least, though, which may be why she was also the most effective seer of the three). Which fits with the "Oracle of Delphi" archetype that the sprites also follow, really.

And add that I think this doesn't make my previous statement invalid. Failed Seer would be still a Seer, that's how incipisphere works. I feel that I have proven it already, so let's just "agree to disagree" (unless of course you come up with another, different idea how to convince me that he is not a valid Seer).

Karkat hating himself for his flaws is something I agree with-- that's a trait all Knights share. If you mean that that's not the case, I'll wait and see what evidence you bring up. Karkat is an outcast, or at least, feels like he is and wants to change that. He projects that angry persona to cover for it, but admits to Meenah that he had a childish fantasy of being in a position of status (a Threshecutioner) and not being killed on the spot for his blood.

I agree that Karkat is an outcast, but there might be more reasons for it than his blood color/mutation, some more "emotional" reason and mutation can serve as a metaphorical way of explaining it to the reader. I believe so, since Reformers are outcasts.
As I still didn't find what was I looking for I'll back myself up with the test and enneagram instead(every one of those quotes is about Reformer type):

Ones have a fine eye for detail. They are always aware of the flaws in themselves, others and the situations in which they find themselves.
...
The One's inability to achieve the perfection they desire feeds their feelings of guilt for having fallen short, and fuels their incipient anger against an imperfect world.

Thet's why I think Karkat is the Reformer. After you wrote that he is type 6, the Loyalist, I remembered this part:

Ones tend to worry and are prone to anxiety and can sometimes mistype as Sixes, but they are far less affiliative than Sixes and their standards are not reached by seeking consensus with a group.

Would you find it sufficient if I delivered proof that Karkat's goal wasn't becoming part of the group but reaching something thaat I like to call "perfection"? (Note: I don't mean he didn't welcome appreciacion or didn't strive to be accepted. I just mean that it was more like side quest for him)

And there goes Kankri:

There are similarities with Kankri and the Sufferer across the Scratch, but they're not really the same person due to the different environments they lived in. Kankri believes it's the right thing to do, but that doesn't somehow mean he's not a smug asshole when he corrects people in conversations that don't involve or impact him in the slightest, or refuses to let them get a word in edgewise. Hell, he outright had a Freudian slip and referred to one of his conversations (I believe with Karkat) as a "monologue" before hastily correcting himself.

Yeah, he is aware that he is speaking shit but remains in denial and tries to convince himself his "monologues" are actually something useful. Much like Karkat convinces himself of his own values, I believe.

The Signless/Sufferer is almost the exact opposite of Kankri in method, and comes off looking like a much better Seer because of it. Here's what Doc Scratch has to say about his methods:

"[...] He would preach heretical ideas no one else had dared to entertain, let alone risk discussing. He espoused the virtues of forgiveness, compassion, and equality among all bloodlines. He distributed his message intelligently, careful to preach only to those receptive, never attracting unwelcome attention."

Contrast Kankri who tries to change his society in a similar manner, but rather than try to teach people the right things to do, tries to shame them out of doing the wrong things, rather than trying to educate people who want to be educated, goes out of his way to bother people who don't care, and as a whole is far too active in his methods to be a good Seer.

Living in such society as Alternian forces one to be very careful- if he tried that straight forward method he used on Beforus he would've been killed (hell, he was killed either way). More tolerant Beforus society allowed him not to be careful and try to "teach" everyone.

Being ashamed and feeling bad is the only thing that drives him to improvement (he didn't quite improved himself very well, but at least tried his best). I think that he tried to make others ashamed too in order to help them become better. Maybe that's not the best method
(it's a goddamn worst method possible. Now that I wrote it it sounded much like Vriska trying to kill others to help them lvl up), but his goals are righteous.

[Jaeri]

Oh my god that character test on the first page is AWFUL. I don't mean to be mean to the creator but the whole thing is biased against certain characters (Feferi) and the questions don't determine much of anything. Yuck.

[capriciousAcolyte]

(I have taken all these tests before, so I'll tell you my results!)

I am the Knight of Blood (conviently! )
I am also a Derse Dreamer.
There's a land quiz thing somewhere and my land is the Land of Dawn and Crowns (lodac)
The personality quiz said I'm most like Sollux, which is weird for me, aha.

[Nobueon]

Prospit Dreamer INFP

Balance Derse Dreamer like Dave

I took thepageofhope's test several times. Order of results through various testing.

Knight of time
Knight of space
Page of Space
Page of Time
Knight of Heart
Page of Heart <--Most recent.

Mage of Breath on that weird one.

And the character I am most like is Dave.

Now as I like to headcanon classpects as doing just the opposite of what a character wants in life.... I never want to hurt anyone. So anything that destroys like Prince of Bard is my class. While the aspect is something I'm not good at. Obviously time, space, and heart are all amazing talents. My lowest scored were Blood, Rage, and Void. Now I often associate blood with unity, leadership, stubbornness, and consistency. So a Prince of Blood would make me a destroy leadership, unity, stubbornness, and consistency. One of my bigger problems in life is maintaining motivational consistency. So I believe that I am actually a Prince of Blood.

And if I remember correctly I once rped something that was both princey and bloody.