Vote: Namboto off we go
Vote: Namboto off we go
sounds good to me (unvote)
Vote Namboto do you have any other opinions? All that post was waving undisclosed info in our faces and then p much sheeping.
But if I say what I suspect is happening, bad things could happen! (also unvote tea)
anyway, what I was hinting at is that I know who was investigated last night (but really nothing else) and I don't want to say who because then they might get shot.
as for other opinions: I still read scum on ~ATH because of the nature of his aggression D1, but I await his words today with eagerness
I read town on dini (as always, it seems)
Sotek's in that null/lime area because while I see reason in his posts, he's also fairly quick to jump on things
Seastorm hasn't spoken, but is null/salmon at the moment because of the sinjin debacle and a lack of reasoning for the jacq lynch
Considering what I don't think is happening, I'm happier-er with tea right now, even though that's unpopular, but it's for similar reasons.
I really want WH to post more because seriously he's only posted 4 times jeez
hmm I guess we have a certain number of semi-lurkers here, in which I'd include Sinjin and WH (talk more you two) but most of all I'm wanting to see Visceral talk and defend himself.
sig quotes I guess? (one of them)
I liked a few things that you said namboto
but then you went and unvoted tea from the pressure >:T
sig quotes I guess? (one of them)
Yeah I can understand you seeing me as a lurker but I got exams so I can't be THAT active these days. Crilly being town means I need some reading to do.
Sanity cops are a bitch.
Which makes me feel relatively useless. :/
Your chumHandle is fractalArmageddons and y0u pr3f3r t0 0mit c3rt41n v0w3ls.
Your chumHandle also is vividInferno and you like to sprak io a notma; tpnr.
Your "other reasons" being?
dat unvote
Which is really weird, cos all that happened between the post you voted and the post you unvoted was a whole bunch of votes on you. Wut.
wait...what?
are you...did you just...
...I feel like this is something im going to regret poking, but im gonna poke all the same. What on earth didnt happen that you thought would happen? A bandwagon on me instead of you?? Like srsly, i've read the posts between your vote and unvote and the only thing i can come up with is...well, <REDACTED>, i cant think of a +EV way to say this. If its a role related thing, i'd rather you didnt.
Alright, I'm caught up-ish. (I replaced in for the Scoffles slot, if anyone needs a reminder)
So, this Namboto thing. I'm... not entirely seeing what everyone is seeing, I don't think? The vote-and-unvote-once-pressured is a Thing, but a lot of what he says reads as a certain town role, and him trying to make sense of things logically.
The Tea/Acio situation day one had some spillover, and I'm not entirely comfortable with Tea, either.
And the Sotek/Dini buddying is troublesome! Like... I have townish reads on them? But it's borderline blatant and worries me slightly, and am not sure how much I can trust those reads, yet.
WateryHell's most recent post is... I don't even know. Whyyy.
Sotek, Mirdini - What are your thoughts on the Acio/Tea interactions in light of Jaq flipping town, and Acio vanishing?
I need to defend myself? :U I think I need to defend Mega.
Alright, so if there was anyone I didn't like from the first four pages that I took notes on, it was Sotek. Here's my Sotek tab:
===== Laset (Sotek)
Sorry if this sounds mean, Sotek. I just wrote all of this in a hurry with no regard for niceties.
I did, actually. I just jumbled my thoughts up horribly. I wanted to ask you two something, and then two people that weren't posting /their/ thoughts on the Acio/Tea situation, and...somehow combined them.
I'll post again when I figure out what I was doing, heh.
Eido: Yes, 'dini and I are blatantly doing a thing that resembles buddying. This is a thing that happens because we both want to nak our reads, both have similar reads, and have mutual townreads. I'm pretty sure it's just a natural consequence of our playstyles. (see: Nightside from day ... uh, four? on until our deaths.)
Anyway, I'm pretty sure my stance on the acio/tea thing was made clear D1, which is that I think Acio is town and I think Tea is being shady-but-not-outright-scummy. Acio vanishing ... makes me think he's either a false martyr or a false-martyr variant; either he vanishes of his own volition to attempt a kill-escape, or he vanishes on being killed, and then he returns at some later point. With the davy jones gifs he was throwing around, I'm inclined to guess he'll return with a kill but I could be wrong there, because this is venturing way out into speculation-land.
Jacq flipping town doesn't affect that read? It makes GX look better somewhat, and makes other people look worse, but wagon analysis is NOT just "who voted them where", it's a lot more in depth than that, and I'm ok with the Aciovote on the Jacqwagon. I am trying the thing I did in nightside of only doing vague analysis until a while in at which point I'm gonna build my in-depth spreadsheet for deep analysis, since that seemed to work pretty okay there - right now my analysis is kind of loosey-goosey.
in re MV: Yeah, you kinda need to defend Mega, he was ... p. scummy? That said I like your start. It's not /great/ but it looks like you're trying! I can at least try to explain the x thing, because it's clear my attempt earlier failed.
Basically: X has a pattern by which he casts his "random" vote, every game. Him following that pattern is in and of itself a nulltell, even though I do believe that RVS can be used for tells if you're careful about it. HOWEVER, I believed at the time of my vote on him that he had multiple choices of who to put his vote on to follow that pattern, and if that were the case the person he chose would have been a scummy person for him to choose. He explained why the people I believed would follow his pattern would in fact NOT have followed the pattern, thereby removing that choice and reducing his vote to a pure nulltell, instead of the scumtell I thought it was. That is why I unvoted.
I was willing to show my hand because I gained nothing by concealing that hand anymore, because it was based on a false assumption. Implying that I'm a gambiteer is uh. Not a problem? I /like/ it when scum think I'm gambiting because they almost never can guess the exact gambit I'm doing so it ends up with them wining themselves super-hard about me and my gambits getting to actually work.
... wait, why didn't you vote me if you disliked what I did so much? maybe I am not as happy as I thought I was, hm... :|
still, Namboto is ... not making me happy, so I will stay there? Like, I really don't like people picking at Sinjin who I have a strong townread on at this point.
LOL I forgot to vote somewhere in there.
Vote Soset
I'll go ahead and pull up my Mega tab here, too.
===== MegaRock35
Mostly keeping this slot open because he reminds me of Jake. :3 Also because holy carp this reaction!
Comes into MSPAfia with a bang. I hope to see you in other games, Rock!
He starts his answer post with this. And then people say that he immediately just got defensive. Buh.
And then I have things in other tabs for other people about these things. I think his answers were alright. If I were new and town for the first time, of course I'd try to find the msot towniest answers, because then you guys would like me and not want me dead. It's really a nulltell for someone whose first game is this one.
Nothing really stands out for him here - I mean all of the points on him d1 were pretty little trite things.
I dont really have a problem with the sotek/dini buddying... it is less the classic mafia term of "buddying" and more a sense of cameradrie between two people who play mafia games together a lot and tend to have similar veins of thinking. That does not, of course, imply that either of them are scum.
Also, whilst this Nambato pressure is all well and good i certainly hope people dont forget about Slayer0 and PP (the latter of whom my vote is still on, and i will wall if i absolutely have to to get people to notice her).
@Sotek/Dini
Fair enough. Just makes me a little uneasy when you guys do the 'Hm, do you see that?' 'Yeah, I see that. Let's kill it' 'Yeah' thing. It forms a pretty vocal (and admittedly tiny, for now) town bloc that people can sheep on, and... you guys aren't /always/ going to be town! But I'll leave it alone, just keep an eye on you both individually, of course. :P
Oh hi I'm back from a second break that was also unannounced.
I would give this game more love but it's kind of INSANE.
I would defs be up for a Namby lynch right now but uh tell me someone else notices ENM repeatedly fluffposting and voting people with literally zero reasoning.
QE typofix.
Yes. Listen to Watts. VOTE:ME
Yeah, uh. Watts.
Don't vote the survivor. He gets powers with votes, or something.
He'll get shot in the face later sometime.
Watts ENM claimed survivor who's also Dragon Fogel's role from either RCF1 or 2 (turns invincible if he gets enough votes, probably softlynch).
I'm sure a vig will take care of him soon enough though I'm surprised they didn't last night.
Oh fer fuck's sake.
Namboto then, Jesus survivorclaims.
sig quotes I guess? (one of them)