Pokémafia {The Genesect of a new era...}

[momatoes]

.......is RVS over :[

I am electing Solaris for the pokeball, because he's got that crazy mean formatting.

[Acionyx]

So...you're excusing someone doing something you think is suspicious on the basis of them normally doing that? Could you point me in the direction of this particular bit of meta?

Mathgirl, please explain a few things:

1: What do you mean "a totally irrelevant manner?"
2: Why are you buddying Mister Visceral via excusing his actions, which you claim to be scummy, on the basis of meta?
3: What meta are you referring to?

~Ath, your vote seems to have, oddly enough, too MUCH reasoning for so early on in the game, not to mention based on one post alone.

Hanky Panky, you obviously have time to post, I'd like you to say something of substance.

Scofflaw, what makes you a "good choice"?

Everyone: do you actually have a reason for your election votes? if you don't have a specific reason (or even a vague reason,) please don't elect; it just wastes space and distracts from the actual game. This is mainly pre-emptive.

Mister Visceral, explain what you find odd about MaskedClaus' justification (that word is a misnomer; it seems more like an explanation.) Also explain why you discarded a reason you gave (referring to: "MaskedClaus seems to not want to take a stand on anything by voting and electing the same person, but this early in the day/game I'm not sure that's such a big deal.")

Geeeeene why are you being metascummy

Like, that scofflaw question why is that remotely a good question this early you know damn well the only answers you could get are role related

[youdont12know]

~ FUCK REASONS ~

Perfectly happy with my vote.

[GenetiXientist]

I'm asking because Red apparently feels that he knows.

[GenetiXientist]

EBWOP: oh, misunderstood the question, it's called "studying about 2 months worth of chemistry notes, mainly dealing with chemical equations, makes you not look over your phrasing as well as you might otherwise." Was asking why he felt the need to say what he did, and try to figure out what Red sees tha makes him agree.

[Havakazoo]

this is me just confirming I have received my role and saying I have just got back from a long trip

so I will sleep now and post properly/read the thread tomorrow

[Acionyx]

EBWOP: oh, misunderstood the question, it's called "studying about 2 months worth of chemistry notes, mainly dealing with chemical equations, makes you not look over your phrasing as well as you might otherwise." Was asking why he felt the need to say what he did, and try to figure out what Red sees tha makes him agree.

...Which is the Thing because you've done coin analysis and other things and you know perfectly well there's not exactly any answers to that that aren't role related

And if you're asking that of red then why aren't you asking it of solaris

[GenetiXientist]

Because I posted before solaris posted, and you didn't ask for the coin and you were his coin elect at the time of my post

[Solaris]

So we've been a few hours into the first day and we are already tripping over each other.
This is going to be a wonderful game I can just tell.

[Acionyx]

Because I posted before solaris posted, and you didn't ask for the coin and you were his coin elect at the time of my post

Point on that

What makes you think red sees anything and isn't just electing him for being scofflaw

[GenetiXientist]

I assume that because scofflaw made a note of it and red immediately followed by electing him that he saw SOMETHING. I don't actually know, and Red probably does, so we're right back to my question of him, but with a meta opt-out clause

[MathGirl277]

So...you're excusing someone doing something you think is suspicious on the basis of them normally doing that? Could you point me in the direction of this particular bit of meta?

Mathgirl, please explain a few things:

1: What do you mean "a totally irrelevant manner?"
2: Why are you buddying Mister Visceral via excusing his actions, which you claim to be scummy, on the basis of meta?
3: What meta are you referring to?

1. His vote was intended as an RVS vote. I see no reason to delve too deeply, and so think that it is irrelevant.
2+3. Played Youtubefia with him, and this seems like normal MV behavior to me. There really isn't too much information at this point. I'm basically basing his behavior model off of Youtubefia, and little else.

Totally unrelated note, why is everyone electing Scofflaw? I don't see anything that particularly marks him in either direction. All of this bandwagoning makes me think that there must be some substantial reasoning, but I cannot see it for the life of me. He seems totally neutral so far.

[MaskedClaus]

Totally unrelated note, why is everyone electing Scofflaw? I don't see anything that particularly marks him in either direction. All of this bandwagoning makes me think that there must be some substantial reasoning, but I cannot see it for the life of me. He seems totally neutral so far.

He elected himself saying that he was a good choice for being elected, but I don't think that's the reason.

[Acionyx]

Ahahaha

Scofflaw did you seriously hint that or am I off to my shitty rolereads early this time

[InoxFy]

Hmm you know something?
Unvote
Elect: MathGirl277

She is, by far, my strongest townread so far. I'm not feeling too strongly on anyone else really, but Mathy looks like a better pokeball candidate than Scoffles to me to be honest.

[hurlingPagan]

Elect: hurlingPagan
Lynch: Nobody, because we lack any knowledge as to who might be scum.

[GenetiXientist]

That's nice, now actually explain, InoxFy, because from what I'm seeing, Mathgirl is trying not to take a stance while giving support to 2 opposing things, based on "meta" from a single game, and dismissing something which other people obviously feel ISN'T irrelevant, based on something that is assumed based on nothing.

[GenetiXientist]

EBWOP:

Acio, I leave this one to you.

[Acionyx]

Why thank you


LYNCH: HURLINGPAGAN

[hurlingPagan]

I'm... I'm not sure why I'm being voted for. What did I do now?

[Acionyx]

Hyperbole aside

No lynching accomplishes noooooothiiiiiiiiing

And you will always be without ~*knowledge*~ about who the scum are because that is the point of the game. If you think waiting for a cop is a good idea you probably haven't run into multiple cop sanities and the like

Point being: the game isn't going to progress without lynches (at least not in any way that's going to help town all that much)

Don't let yourself think that we don't know anything because there's plenty to analyze all the time, the trick is to start looking

[InoxFy]

You are honestly asking that question?

You're essentially saying "Hey look guise, I don't know who is town and who scum is so I must be town rite? I am not going to make any effort to discover who IS scum but that's besides the point"
And that is a very, very scum-like behaviour.

About Mathy... I thought she had posted a bit more than that to be honest... I might be getting games mixed up. Either way, it looks like she's making an effort to analyze stuff.

[hurlingPagan]

Wow, maybe its that nobody seems scummy to me. Perhaps that's the case, because I'm pretty sure that's what I'm saying. I haven't played mafia and seen scum lynched in forever, I don't know what to look for.

Regardless, I'll just take my dodrio and linoone and sit over here.

[Airey]

LYNCH NO ONE

WH4T NOW ACIO?

Elect acio

[Red709]

EBWOP: oh, misunderstood the question, it's called "studying about 2 months worth of chemistry notes, mainly dealing with chemical equations, makes you not look over your phrasing as well as you might otherwise." Was asking why he felt the need to say what he did, and try to figure out what Red sees tha makes him agree.

EXCUSE ME BUT DID SOMEBODY FORGET TO CHECK TIMESTAMPS?? yes, you did. Scoffles ninja'd me, you dork

also @ HurlingPagan: LYNCH IT

LUNCH HURLINGPAGAN