MSPA Forums
Page 54 of 74 FirstFirst ... 4445152535455565764 ... LastLast
Results 1,326 to 1,350 of 1842

Thread: Pokemon aren't for children.

  1. #1326

    Re: Pokemon aren't for children.

    Fuck you man, how dare you think that. Once a rocketbro, ALWAYS a rocketbro.

  2. #1327

    Re: Pokemon aren't for children.

    Hey! You're back! Just a word of warning if you didn't catch it before, these guys can talk to you through this thing, so be careful what you listen to from me/us. Though, we/I suppose you already knew I/we are half broken and crazy. So while most of we/me likes you, I/we can't say that we/I like you completely.

  3. #1328
    Angry Robot BigBurkhart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    3,682

    Re: Pokemon aren't for children.

    Well, honestly buddy, I'm just as confused as to how many sides there are to this little backstab-fest. When it comes down to it, though, my loyalties will always lie with Team Rocket. I mean, come on, it's in my freaking NAME.

  4. #1329
    I'd strike that earth. Gnauga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    2,999

    Re: Pokemon aren't for children.

    Woahwhoawhoawhoawhoawhoa
    Woaaaah there
    You've got some crazy-eye going on. You're still our favorite, grunt, though you should consider getting a remoraid-gun like Arnie.
    We're rocketbot, remember? Rocket through and through. Any subroutine that disagrees can come fight me. I'll be at 0x8130.

  5. #1330
    Angry Robot BigBurkhart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    3,682

    Re: Pokemon aren't for children.

    0x8130? THAT hellhole? You've got some serious bugs in your code if you want to go THERE, even if it's just to fight.

  6. #1331
    Beware, I <3 words. gloomyMoron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    4,422

    Re: Pokemon aren't for children.

    We're kind of broken. We're still in control of our functions. They don't control us, but they can get into our speech patterns. Make us say things. Mess with our perceptions, perhaps. We need Science Lady. Maybe she can root out their trick, restore some of our functions. Until then, we can't fully be trusted. We should probably give Nincada back to you.


  7. #1332
    Insignificant User Not The Author's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Center of the Universe
    Posts
    7,345

    Re: Pokemon aren't for children.

    Yup! We've been playing you from the start. Fallen right into our trap! No possible way you can get out of this one, haha, nope. You'd have to be able to beat a Dusknoir, Musharna, and Muk behind a Light Screen in a Trick Room! Totally impossible. Better make an about face before you take a surprise attack that shatters your world. Or can't you take a hint?
    ...But it's probably just me.

    The Magician | The Chariot | The Hermit | The World || The Moon || The Deck

  8. #1333

    Re: Pokemon aren't for children.

    Quote Originally Posted by Not The Author View Post
    Yup! We've been playing you from the start. Fallen right into our trap! No possible way you can get out of this one, haha, nope. You'd have to be able to beat a Dusknoir, Musharna, and Muk behind a Light Screen in a Trick Room! Totally impossible. Better make an about face before you take a surprise attack that shatters your world. Or can't you take a hint?
    *Digital Wink*

  9. #1334
    The Bane Grutor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Land of Jinx and ♠ ♦ • ◘ ◙ ∙Misfortuπe (Ω∞)
    Posts
    773

    Re: Pokemon aren't for children.

    ...

    I, I was...

    These ideas...

    They weren't real?...

    Seems logical, but...

    I'm sure it came from my AI...



    The hell is going on!?

  10. #1335

    Re: Pokemon aren't for children.

    >This unit is compromised.
    >A faulty unit will be disposed of.
    >I don't want to die.
    *drop Nincada*
    >Use Toxic!

  11. #1336
    Chaos Weaver Asmodemus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    9,689

    Re: Pokemon aren't for children.

    "I didn't mean to, I'm not sure about the others.

    This is all getting confusing. We need a summary."
    The only constant is Chaos.
    Avatar by the Amazing Gentrigger, author of Songs we sing, with some minor terrible editing by me to fit.

  12. #1337

    Re: Pokemon aren't for children.

    You know what we should do? Kill the filter programs. We're A.I. We can control our own shi*

  13. #1338
    Hype's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    The cornfields of Ada Ohio.
    Posts
    827

    Re: Pokemon aren't for children.

    I haven't been betraying you at all - but it appears that 3 of my voices have been. I suggest we silence those voices right now...

  14. #1339

    Re: Pokemon aren't for children.

    User "Grunt"'s access level is currently "Owner".

    This unit's speech filters have been compromised. Please disregard all audible cues from this unit until a solution has been found.

  15. #1340

    Re: Pokemon aren't for children.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ganelon View Post
    User "Grunt"'s access level is currently "Owner".

    This unit's speech filters have been compromised. Please disregard all audible cues from this unit until a solution has been found.
    Wait... My name is filter.exe... Does that mean, I'm the problem? I didn't want to be the problem! I don't want to be the problem. Maybe I should filter out the problem. Then I can be a good filter! Give me a command owner, give me something to filter, or something to stop filtering. Pleee-bzzzt... Buffer Overload, refreshing buffer...eeease!
    Last edited by PinkMawile; 01-19-2012 at 02:46 PM.

  16. #1341
    Conferrer of Dimensions
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Land of Language and Lies
    Posts
    130

    Re: Pokemon aren't for children.

    Gerald, is our current identity crisis also a result of your machinations? Surely a demonstration of multiple independent voices would create a smokescreen for variances in you, and your associates, speech patterns.

  17. #1342
    I'd strike that earth. Gnauga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    2,999

    Re: Pokemon aren't for children.

    Turtle, I uh.
    I don't think that's how you block a bypass.
    The problem is that our filters didn't filter the things that would have been good to filter. Our filter was in fact, bypassed. Ignored like they weren't there.
    I guess there's some code in us that allows a Rocket with sufficient clearance to use a Rocketbot like a megaphone. That's essentially what happened here. Being what we are, I don't think we can rewrite our own software, but maybe we can try?


    Also, hi Gerald. You should shave. That beard makes you look downright villainous.

  18. #1343

    Re: Pokemon aren't for children.

    Quote Originally Posted by Gnauga View Post
    Turtle, I uh.
    I don't think that's how you block a bypass.
    The problem is that our filters didn't filter the things that would have been good to filter. Our filter was in fact, bypassed. Ignored like they weren't there.
    I guess there's some code in us that allows a Rocket with sufficient clearance to use a Rocketbot like a megaphone. That's essentially what happened here. Being what we are, I don't think we can rewrite our own software, but maybe we can try?


    Also, hi Gerald. You should shave. That beard makes you look downright villainous.
    BUT!!! Traitor Proto-Call!!!! Gerald is traitor!! all privileges revoke!! You are not a rocket anylonger

  19. #1344

    Re: Pokemon aren't for children.

    >> So.... who here knows how to shut off select voices in my head?

  20. #1345
    Beware, I <3 words. gloomyMoron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    4,422

    Re: Pokemon aren't for children.

    > Science Lady. We need Science Lady to repair us. She's not openly hostile to us at least.

    Grunt, we are an artificial intelligence. We are programs, processes, zeros and ones. We aren't your friend only because we aren't really real. We are sapient, but not sentient in that we are aware, and, arguably, intelligent but we cannot feel things like pain or emotions. Some processes emulate such things, others are more pragmatic. We are not friends Grunt, as much as the collective us which it to be so, simply because we are a robot. For what it's worth, we haven't betrayed you. We wouldn't willingly betray you, but this unit is compromised. Most of our processes still recognize you as "owner". As "friend". As "rocket". But.. there is a corruption; a knot of discord that is spreading across our consciousnesses. We need you to trust us. We need repairs. We need you to disable us and to defeat these traitors. Use it.

    Grunt. Use your Pokemon for us. Find the Scientist lady. She has a Porygon, the artificial pokemon. It can enter our programming. Fix us. Maybe. We might not be us after words, but it is better than betraying you. If we had a self-destruct/self-shutdown sequence, we would use it before betraying you.


  21. #1346
    The Bane Grutor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Land of Jinx and ♠ ♦ • ◘ ◙ ∙Misfortuπe (Ω∞)
    Posts
    773

    Re: Pokemon aren't for children.

    Quote Originally Posted by gloomyMoron View Post
    > Science Lady. We need Science Lady to repair us. She's not openly hostile to us at least.

    Grunt, we are an artificial intelligence. We are programs, processes, zeros and ones. We aren't your friend only because we aren't really real. We are sapient, but not sentient in that we are aware, and, arguably, intelligent but we cannot feel things like pain or emotions. Some processes emulate such things, others are more pragmatic. We are not friends Grunt, as much as the collective us which it to be so, simply because we are a robot. For what it's worth, we haven't betrayed you. We wouldn't willingly betray you, but this unit is compromised. Most of our processes still recognize you as "owner". As "friend". As "rocket". But.. there is a corruption; a knot of discord that is spreading across our consciousnesses. We need you to trust us. We need repairs. We need you to disable us and to defeat these traitors. Use it.

    Grunt. Use your Pokemon for us. Find the Scientist lady. She has a Porygon, the artificial pokemon. It can enter our programming. Fix us. Maybe. We might not be us after words, but it is better than betraying you. If we had a self-destruct/self-shutdown sequence, we would use it before betraying you.
    How about just shutting down for a bit till someone removes the extra lines of code interfering with the main block? No that wouldn't do, how about activating anti virus protocol since we know this unit is infected.


  22. #1347

    Re: Pokemon aren't for children.

    >Science Lady. We need Science Lady to repair us. She's not openly hostile to us at least.
    First can she even do it? Oh I have no doubt she doesn't lack the skills per se, but she did confess her lack of knowledge as to what exactly make us tick as we are a composite. maybe she would find out but can we really afford the time it might take her to figure out to reverse engineer that particular part of us (or at least our programing)

    Second, I'm not really sure why some or at least one of the other subroutine seems to trust her so much, but she's definitively not above manipulating us (remember how she tried to sway us against rocketman), she's got her own agenda to which she seems driven with a cold determination and she's not above brutal almost refreshingly direct drastic action when necessary. What make you think she wouldn't alter us given her own purpose ? Even if she considered us too insignificant a threat or an asset, she might a least make sure we aren't a potential nuisance. I do find her interesting to chat with. But as to trust her with our programing ?

    Third. Mr Gerald wasn't being hostile right now. He merely made a show of force to assess his superiority but he' s not out for blood, or I'm pretty sure Mr Arnold would be much worse for wear. He gave a chance to surrender and we haven't really listened to what he was suggesting. It's Mr Arnold who wants to play hardball in front of pretty tough odds here. such loyalty to his mission is admirable, certainly, I suppose at least but one think he might at least have taken the time to try to talk before immediately raising the pokeball ? or at least play along and wait for a more favorable moment.
    (Make no mistake, I'm not suggesting to ally with him on a long term, too late for that and anyway I wants his guts as a rotor decoration as much as everyone else to teach us to use us like he did. I'm just pointing out that rash judgment was made and I doubt Arnold is going to trust us anymore anyway so there's not particular point in being nice to him.
    Oh well Mr Rocketgrunt is back (we really need another name to call him) so that means we are siding with him for now.)


    ...But... fourth, we may be a mere moving camera and mic and a toll for team rocket, be we do have the potentiality for more, I think. At some point it might be interesting to consider that if we must keep choosing side, "ourselves" might be an option no ? we're weak but we do have other advantages. Food for thoughts certainly.

    But I do digress, point is I don't really trust Emily that and Rocketeam forever ! And all that.
    First objective should be to get rid of that psychic Pokemon, this dampening field can't stay if we're going to battle and I believe our newly arrives rocketgrunt is conveniently just out of it.

    Last edited by smuchmuch; 01-19-2012 at 08:01 PM.

  23. #1348

    Re: Pokemon aren't for children.

    Quote Originally Posted by Grutor View Post
    How about just shutting down for a bit till someone removes the extra lines of code interfering with the main block? No that wouldn't do, how about activating anti virus protocol since we know this unit is infected.
    Oh oh, I know I know! Let's shut off wireless! Be a closed system! No data streaming in, no data streaming out, only us, no one outside making me filter bad things! It is perfect! Only allow audio out and audio in!

  24. #1349
    ikkonoishi's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Land of Ulms and Spidermonkeys
    Posts
    1,269

    Re: Pokemon aren't for children.

    Now come then grunt. You've never really trusted us. We were useful so you used us, but you never really revealed anything to us that we wouldn't have known from being owned by dead girl.

  25. #1350
    makuta's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    In your base, defeating your forces
    Posts
    1,209

    Re: Pokemon aren't for children.

    > ...Override code found.

    > Override code deleted.

    > Locking out all outside protocol except from users these multiple AI processors have deemed trustworthy.


    > No more remote controlling from you three.

    > Let's get out of here, pal.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •